Jump to content

Wish AUDIO NOTE OTO LINE SE tube amp audition


olegau

Recommended Posts

I think to buy a AUDIO NOTE OTO LINE SE tube amplifier base on its review only.  It is expensive one so I would like to audit it but I did not find any shop in Melbourne.

Maybe someone can help me to find one for audition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



 
Here is review of AUDIO NOTE OTO SE  You would think this amp is value for money, but nothing could be further from the truth. A similar spec'ed Unison research or Audion Sterling happen to be far wiser choices to go for if you actually had to buy an amp, rather than win one at a raffle. 
You want grain? Get the OTO SE. Solo violin sounds astonishingly strident regardless of how sweet the actual recording was. I have rarely heard the Lara St John HDCD sound as bad as it did over an AN CD, oto SE, totem combo,
oh, far too rarely. Solo violin is a torture test for the oto se. So are saxophones. Get an Audio NOT! oto SE int. amp today and be the laughing stock of the entire audio world. To be fair, it has a nice set of pots. And you can use it s chassis to play drums on! They really ring!
So 4 stars for the chassis! ONE star for the rest!   http://www.audioreview.com/product/amplification/amplifiers/audio-note/oto-phono-se.html

It is scare me because I am after classical music:(

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you attending the hifi show next month? Audio Note Australia will have a room there where you can have a listen and ask questions of the exhibitor.

 

I wouldn't let one dodgy user review on that site to define what a Audio Note amp can and can't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



32 minutes ago, Muon N' said:

Are you attending the hifi show next month? Audio Note Australia will have a room there where you can have a listen and ask questions of the exhibitor.

 

 I did not find AUDIO NOTE on the list:(

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Volunteer
On 15/09/2018 at 12:41 AM, olegau said:

I think to buy a AUDIO NOTE OTO LINE SE tube amplifier base on its review only.  It is expensive one so I would like to audit it but I did not find any shop in Melbourne.

Maybe someone can help me to find one for audition. 

why would you buy an expensive amp based only on reviews?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Muon N' said:

Just had a look and you are correct that Audio Note is not listed.

 

My mistake.

Remember there are 2 shows in Melbourne this year, on consecutive weekends no less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



38 minutes ago, Anthony1 said:

That’s the weirdest so called review/opinion I’ve ever read.

And therefore impossible to take seriously.

Unless the review has been conducted COMPLETELY independently, with absolutely no possibility of corrupt practices and with a full suite of objectives tests, then it cannot be taken seriously. That goes for positive AND negative reviews. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zaphod Beeblebrox said:

Unless the review has been conducted COMPLETELY independently, with absolutely no possibility of corrupt practices and with a full suite of objectives tests, then it cannot be taken seriously. That goes for positive AND negative reviews. 

That's when reasoning needs to be applied.

 

If 9 out of 10 users say great amp and one not... It's reasonable to expect those 9 to be a more accurate appraisal. If 9 out of 10 say crap amp, then It's reasonable to expect the opposite. Or you can apply no reasoning, and look for those completely independent tests, but are they, or are subconscious biases at play and you are unaware of it just like the tester is unaware of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Muon N' said:

That's when reasoning needs to be applied.

Indeed.

 

1 minute ago, Muon N' said:

 

If 9 out of 10 users say great amp and one not... It's reasonable to expect those 9 to be a more accurate appraisal. If 9 out of 10 say crap amp, then It's reasonable to expect the opposite.

No, I don't accept that either. I invoke the Emperor's New Clothes rule. In fact, I have been in this biz a long time. I recall when a new and different technology amplifier was released. It looked a million Bucks, had a fantastic story and pretty glossy brochures accompanying it. I heard it and hated it, along with most critical, experienced listeners. EVERY single reviewer on the planet raved about. Owners raved about it. Funny thing is: Today, those same reviewers and listeners would only use that amplifier as a door-stop or a boat anchor. It was crap then, it is crap now. It's just that the manufacturer's marketing arm was VERY well funded. I can only imagine that a large chunk of money was shovelled discretely into the pockets of corrupt reviewers. Most of those reviewers still have their jobs. Funny about that. 

 

That is far from the only example. There are many, many more. Reviewers drive nice cars and live in nice homes. 

 

1 minute ago, Muon N' said:

 

Or you can apply no reasoning, and look for those completely independent tests, but are they, or are subconscious biases at play and you are unaware of it just like the tester is unaware of it.

A properly conducted, independent test should do away with any bias. That would, of course, be a very rare thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



22 minutes ago, Zaphod Beeblebrox said:

No, I don't accept that either. I invoke the Emperor's New Clothes rule. In fact, I have been in this biz a long time. I recall when a new and different technology amplifier was released. It looked a million Bucks, had a fantastic story and pretty glossy brochures accompanying it. I heard it and hated it, along with most critical, experienced listeners. EVERY single reviewer on the planet raved about. Owners raved about it. Funny thing is: Today, those same reviewers and listeners would only use that amplifier as a door-stop or a boat anchor. It was crap then, it is crap now. It's just that the manufacturer's marketing arm was VERY well funded. I can only imagine that a large chunk of money was shovelled discretely into the pockets of corrupt reviewers. Most of those reviewers still have their jobs. Funny about that. 

 

That is far from the only example. There are many, many more. Reviewers drive nice cars and live in nice homes.

Sure there are many variables, including where the user is coming from in respect to there system, room, other equipment and personal preferences and experience with comparable gear. It's far from black and white, ever.

Also I'm talking about user reviews like the OP was looking at, and not professional ones.

 

25 minutes ago, Zaphod Beeblebrox said:

A properly conducted, independent test should do away with any bias. That would, of course, be a very rare thing.

How can someone do away with biases that are acting on an unconscious level?

 

There is also the personal preferences, if someone prefers triode connections over UL, or visa versa, they are not going to favour the topology that they prefer less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Muon N' said:

Sure there are many variables, including where the user is coming from in respect to there system, room, other equipment and personal preferences and experience with comparable gear. It's far from black and white, ever.

Also I'm talking about user reviews like the OP was looking at, and not professional ones.

I get that. My original comments apply. Independence MUST be verified, along with proper objective tests.

 

2 hours ago, Muon N' said:

 

How can someone do away with biases that are acting on an unconscious level?

A proper DBT does so. 

 

2 hours ago, Muon N' said:

 

There is also the personal preferences, if someone prefers triode connections over UL, or visa versa, they are not going to favour the topology that they prefer less.

Again, a properly conducted test does not invalidate such things. ALL reviewers allow their personal preference to dictate their subjective testing. Which is why objective testing MUST accompany all reviews. It's why we all should ignore subjective-only testing. It is unreliable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



13 hours ago, Sir Sanders Zingmore said:

why would you buy an expensive amp based only on reviews?

People say this is a unique  sound amp, very good for classical and jazz I am after. 

This amp has a Balance knob. I need it.

Edited by olegau
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Muon N' said:

 

 

If 9 out of 10 users say great amp and one not... It's reasonable to expect those 9 to be a more accurate appraisal.  

Unfortunately 9 of 10 can be wrong for my taste. I have bad experience buying an amp without audition. Once I bought an amp Yamaha RS300 based on hundreds positive reviews. It was resold next day because clinical sound I do not like. Since that I am afraid to buy amps without audition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@olegau Bottom line is you will need to find an owner or distributor/retailer that has one of the amps you are interested in, and see of a demo is possible.

 

The whole review discussion will not meet your needs.

 

Hope it works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Volunteer
28 minutes ago, olegau said:

People say this is a unique  sound amp, very good for classical and jazz I am after. 

This amp has a Balance knob. I need it.

I owned one of these, many many years ago.

My experience was that its performance depends very much on the speakers it is attached to. Anything requiring a lot of power or current will not be a good match

 

What is the rest of your system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...
To Top