Jump to content

georgehifi

Member
  • Posts

    6,253
  • Joined

Posts posted by georgehifi

  1. Are you in Melbourne, George? :) If so, you might like to try it out against a 5th? But to do a fair comparison, we have to have the same loading on each - so what loads does the TE Micro Groove accommodate?

    Regards,

    Andy

    I don't have one of the Tom Evens Micro Grooves myself it was lent to us by the importer for a phono stage shootout at the Ason (Sydney) audio society one month, the others were the top Dynavector phono, EAR's highly regarded one, and the one Allen Wright and Joe Rassmussen do for around $1800, and another tube one I forget.

    Cheers George

  2. Why is it called a "passive pre-amp" if it introduces its own amplification? What is passive about it? I thought that a passive pre-amp merely attenuated a fixed signal from a line source. Otherwise, isn't it an "active" pre-amp?

    That's what I'm getting at, they should not be called passive preamps as they do not preamplify the signal, they should be called passive attenuators.

    Cheers George

  3. you have a passive pre-amp within your CD player or other source.

    Sorry to have to correct you here, but the volume control within his Sony XA7-ES is just a passive attenuator (cheap pot) on the output, not a passive preamp, as to say passive preamp means it has some sort of preamplification going on,(hence the word preamplify) and that has to be active with gain after the passive pot. His fixed output of the Sony would sound better but you need some way to control the volume (a better passive attenuator) rather than the cheap pot Sony uses.

    Cheers George

  4. Yep my favorite motto is,

    "The Best Preamp is no Preamp"

    As most sources these days have so much gain they can send nearly all amps into clipping without the need to preamplify as well. You just need a way to control the volume. This is why passive attenuators are making such a big comeback, you just have to have low source (cdp or phono stage) output impedance <200ohms or less which most are.

    And poweramps of >47K or more input impedance, which most are.

    Then you can have that sound of transparency/dynamics and zero colouration of no preamp in the signal path.

    Cheers George

  5. I think the older intergrated Audiolab topology is a bit like the older Musical Fidelity intergrateds, the power amp sections have less gain stages than normal poweramps as from what I've seen inside on some of these when I've had them for repair they use high gain preamp sections where it's cheaper using sometimes opamp after opamp.

    Cheers George

  6. Well if the source is 5kohm output impedance as Tuyen has found out and the input the the LFD is 8.2kohm as stated here and posted by ozmillsy http://home.scarlet.be/~tsc64115/pro.../lfd02_en.html

    then you have a bad impedance mismatch and can only be hepled by 3 ways in order of the simplest to do first

    1 insert a buffer like the Burson directy after the source. or

    2 by raising the input impedance of the amp by a tech from 8.2k to around 100kohm

    3 by somehow getting the source down below 100ohms

    Cheers George

  7. Click the link in Georgehifi's signature.

    How did we get onto this website ragging anyway, it's got nothing to do with hifi sound.

    It's a free Optus website for subscribers, and that's all I need to keep pricing down as I have orders comming out of my yingyang, doesn't make my product sound better or worse, no voodoo intended here.

    Cheers George

  8. [quote=johnnydarko;389216

    Who needs to "brush up on Ohms law"? .

    People who belive there's some sort of magic voodoo going on, and argue the fact, and have know knowledge of why?

    5Kohms dictates that it could be just a simple cathode follower tube output maybe with a volume control before it after the I/V stage or it is a 5kohm passive volume control after the tube stage. It's all relative to basic Ohms Law principle that most of us learnt in high school.

    Cheers George

×
×
  • Create New...
To Top