Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Catch it whilst you still can, they're going their separate ways, from our perspective. So close together yet still over 600 million kilometres apart.

 

 

Sorry for the picture quality, it's from my phone as I walked back from putting the bins out.

post-140410-0-68821900-1435823725_thumb.

Edited by JukKluk2
  • Like 4

Guest Muon
Posted

Looked out off the patio, saw a few pairs of stars like that, but I think they are single ones in reality...damn old eyes :lol:

Guest Muon
Posted

Damn! should have rented a unit facing the other way.

Guest Muon
Posted

Got it, the bright one is very bright!

Posted (edited)

G'day all, thanks for the heads up on this as I didn't know about this.  A very clear night up here and an impressive sight in the North Western sky! :thumb:  Regards, Felix.

Edited by catman
Posted (edited)

I'll be heading out shortly... I don't like my chances of seeing it from in my 'hood.

Bummer. The downside of city living.

Cheers,

Leigh

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by ferchersan
  • Like 1
Posted

I thought you were talking out Uranus but decided to go out and see.

 

Saw them straight away in the sky north west of us. Top one particularly bright.

 

Tried taking a photo with the phone, even had the flash on, but not as good as yours, JK.

Posted

G'day all, with that sort of shot you don't want any flash!  Regards, Felix. 

Posted

I went out and flashed. My neighbours were seeing stars.

 

That's the problem with commie schools these days. Lousy education. See, Jake, it's like this....Venus and Mars are not stars.

 

When you flashed there is a good chance you would have been eclipsed.

Posted

Tried it again with flash on higher. Turned out much better.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(I tell a lie, I did get a good pic, but not with flash).

Hope you were on time-lapse S-M ... NotSoBright,JeffL

Posted

G'day mate, no, because flash just obscures the two weak points of light that you're trying to photograph, a bit like the general effect of city lights.  Those sorts of astronomical objects are difficult to photograph, requiring maximum zoom and a very steady hand and longish exposure times and accurate 'metering', although having said that digital cameras can do quite well.  Regards, Felix. 

Posted

That's the problem with commie schools these days. Lousy education. See, Jake, it's like this....Venus and Mars are not stars.

When you flashed there is a good chance you would have been eclipsed.

post-105380-143582846087.jpg
  • Like 5

Posted

G'day mate, no, because flash just obscures the two weak points of light that you're trying to photograph, a bit like the general effect of city lights.  Those sorts of astronomical objects are difficult to photograph, requiring maximum zoom and a very steady hand and longish exposure times and accurate 'metering', although having said that digital cameras can do quite well.  Regards, Felix. 

 

 

I apologise, catman. I was teasing.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just went out for a squizz, very bright!

 

I was worried as a plane nearly flew into them, must have swerved in a nic of time.

  • Like 2
Posted

Why is it always so hard to photograph stars or planets.

Two beers & two set of batteries & this is all I could come up with!

 

Next time don't swallow the batteries. It will be much easier. Just the beer will be OK.

  • Like 3
Posted

G'day mate, the basic problem is accurate 'metering'.  Things were actually much worse and harder in the old days of film based photography.  Without 'spot' metering such astronomical photography was 'very' difficult, and a tripod was mandatory in any case!  Regards, Felix.

  • Like 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...
To Top