Volunteer sir sanders zingmore Posted March 23, 2014 Volunteer Posted March 23, 2014 Is there any logical explanation why this stuff should work? http://www.acoustic-revive.com/english/rr77/rr77_01.html For Listening room Also, by generating the Schumann Resonance, there is an effect that it neutralizes harmful standing waves. And it has the feature of improving the viscosity of the air in the listening room. Therefore, you can reproduce the excellent music, the sound is improved clearly audible, and the depth of the sound image is increased dramatically.
niss_man Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 We had one of those at the recent dac gtg. There was about 50-50 those who heard a.change in sound. I was one who heard no difference. Simon
Volunteer sir sanders zingmore Posted March 23, 2014 Author Volunteer Posted March 23, 2014 We had one of those at the recent dac gtg. There was about 50-50 those who heard a.change in sound. I was one who heard no difference. Simon At THE recent DAC gtg? How come no one mentioned it? Was it tested blind as well?
alcarp Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 At THE recent DAC gtg? How come no one mentioned it? Was it tested blind as well? No, it wasn't done blind. A real pity as this is one instance where its easy to do a blind test. Perhaps someone else who owns one can organize it.
DoggieHowser Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 At THE recent DAC gtg? How come no one mentioned it? Was it tested blind as well? Pretty sure I mentioned the RR777 in that thread.
Luc Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 A view from the sceptical side... Facts and Fiction of the Schumann Resonance
BradC Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Do you think that little box has an antenna 9500km long? That is what is required to efficiently radiate energy at that frequency 2
Telecine Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Do you think that little box has an antenna 9500km long? That is what is required to efficiently radiate energy at that frequency You are proving to be very useful on these controversial subjects. Keep up the good work.
BradC Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Have a look at this for the details of a real elf transmitter http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Sanguine 1
aechmea Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 (edited) Quote from that wiki link. Doesn't this sound like Bybee's CV? US Navy? 1970's? Comms? Limited? Submarines? Is there enough evidence of a really good conspiracy theory here? Project Sanguine was a U.S. Navy project, proposed in 1968 and only implemented in a more limited form, to create a hardened extremely low frequency (ELF) radio transmitter facility in Wisconsin to communicate with deeply submerged submarines Edited March 23, 2014 by aechmea
Volunteer sir sanders zingmore Posted March 23, 2014 Author Volunteer Posted March 23, 2014 Do you think that little box has an antenna 9500km long? That is what is required to efficiently radiate energy at that frequency I don't think it radiates EMF I think it does sound waves. The Schumann thing is electromagnetic so that makes me question the whole thing even more.
BradC Posted March 23, 2014 Posted March 23, 2014 Unless you have the correct size room, there is nothing special about a 7.83Hz acoustic tone. It doesn't look much like a subwoofer either
Volunteer sir sanders zingmore Posted March 23, 2014 Author Volunteer Posted March 23, 2014 It's special because it is the frequency of Mother Nature
Guest myrantz Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 FWIW there's already a thread about the product here. Request to merge the two threads?
==A== Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 They should publish independent test data proving their claims - very sceptical about any product claiming to remove standing wave issues. Not qualified / knowledgeable enough to comment on other claims
Assisi Posted April 22, 2014 Posted April 22, 2014 I have only just noticed this thread. I was the person who brought the Acoustic Revive RR777 to the GTG mainly for Mike to listen too. It was not tried when every one was listening attentively. There were people who did not notice the change when it was on. My understanding was that some people including Mike did hear the change for the better. Maybe in some situations it will not work for some people. I can assure the doubters that in my situation it works without any question. Why it works for me I don't know. Everyone I have tried it with in my house including people who do not listen to music could all hear the benefit. In some cases I have turned on and off when they did even not know what I was trying. For me it money very well spent. I recommend people have a sale or return trial. John
Recommended Posts