Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Apart from it having a rectangular beam it's not in any way a clone of the Dynavector as that works in a completely different manner with the front section of the tonearm being a separate horizontal pivot. The Abis is solid and only has movement at the main pivot

Posted (edited)

I believe you as I have not seen it.

 

But seems odd to have a separate fix section that must bolted/fixed to the main arm, when the whole thing could have been machined out of the same piece, and been made even more ridgid. 

 

Cheers George

Edited by georgehifi
Posted

I believe you as I have not seen it.

 

But seems odd to have a separate fix section that must bolted/fixed to the main arm, when the whole thing could have been machined out of the same piece, and been made even more ridgid. 

 

Cheers George

It looks like it may be 1 piece.

Quote

The most obvious junk in the SA-1's trunk is its wide armtube of rectangular cross-section, a design distinction that gives it a passing resemblance to Dynavector's classic 507 models. Adding to that impression is the fact that the SA-1's offset angle, specified as 22°, is achieved not with a bend or a curve in the tube but with what appears, at first glance, to be a separate structural element, mounted at an angle to the main "beam." (A closer look reveals that this frontmost portion of the Abis arm is neither adjustable nor separate—the whole of it is apparently cast in one piece before being machine-finished—and so the hyper-adjustable Dynavectors remain unchallenged in that regard.)

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...
To Top