Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm thinking of upgrading my old 47" TV, which we have been quite happy with the quality. 

I had a quick look online, and there are so many spec's that I'm not sure what is appropriate for my needs and what might be overkill.  I noticed that 47" doesn't seem to be a standard size, so am assuming that a 50" with a slimline surround would be similar overall dimensions. 

 

My current TV spec's (from the brochure):

• HD LCD display, 1920x1080p

• 100Hz Clear LCD for superb motion sharpness (3ms)

• Brightness: 550 cd/m²
• Contrast ratio (typical): 1200:1
• Dynamic screen contrast: 8000:1
• Response time (typical): 3 (BEW equiv.) ms

 

My viewing requirements:

- broadcast tv (not sport)

- DVD, Blu-ray

- Netflix

- I don't use it for gaming. 

- Given my current use, I'm not sure that 4K would be worthwhile. 

** I want the new tv to have economical power use (for the size) **

 

Advice I'm looking for:

- What spec's in a modern TV should I be looking at that would suit my needs? 

- What technology would be best to look for (eg. LCD, or other exotic variants)?

- Suggestions on audio - I assume that all new tv's need soundbars, for movies, concerts, etc I put audio through the hifi, but with age/hearing looming would need a soundbar with good clarity.  What to look for in soundbars, and how much $?

- Suggestions on audio - my current TV has RCA L+R audio output, so audio can be routed into my vintage 2channel hifi (my amp doesn't take hdmi).  I assume the HDMI -> RCA outputs would be required to achieve this on a new TV (the don't seem to have 2-ch audio out). 

- am I correct that the soundbar would use the HDMI-Arc output.  Would the HDMI->RCA adapter also require the HDMI-Arc output?  How can they co-exist? 

- If I needed extra hdmi inputs, would a hdmi splitter work, and would it degrade audio/video quality?

- how much difference in quality is there between the big-name brands and the more generic brands? 

 

Plus any other info that will help me.

I recognise that I've left it too late for the black friday sales, but am anticipating chirstmas and new year sales coming up. 

Thanks in advance. 

 

 

Posted

Have lots of questions to help reduce the list to hopefully a few choices:

  • max budget
  • size and type of room e.g. shared, bright etc
  • watching habits, day, night, on your own, with family
  • current TV make and model
  • brand preferences, none ?
  • technology preferences, none?
  • more details of sources  in use,  streaming services
  • any home theater plans? 
  • Importance of audio? medium, I think, 
  • Importance of video ? Low?
  • Very important for lower power use? 
  • Looking for a ranking of your selection criteria

Your questions on HDMI, audio etc. are relatively easy to answer.  For example, if audio is important and you mostly watch on your own, why not a wireless headphones?  Many TVs have poor audio, so sound bar is a good option, but many choices available.  All modem TVs have multiple HDMI, and there are options to feed legacy systems at various price points and quality.

Posted

Our budget is not excessive, am wanting to know how much need to spend to get something reasonably good that will last years.  But don't want to spend money on features that I won't use or appreciate. 

Viewing distance is about 3m, we find our current Philips 47" a good size, can't go bigger and don't want to go smaller. 

Generally watch in subdued lighting.  The room is medium+ size. 

Would be interested to know which brands are good and which ones are to be avoided nowdays.

No interest in home theater/surround, when I want good sound will listen via the 2-ch hifi. 

Will watch TV with others.  Don't like headphones. 

Currently have an old AppleTV to stream netflix.  Will probably be OK with the interface in a new TV.  Not really wanting to sign up for more. 

Power consumption is of concern, have had high bills and unsure why they don't go down when we do things to try to reduce (eg. didn't notice any difference when our incandescents were changed to LED lights).

Do want good picture quality, that has detail and isn't harsh.  Don't want to be paying big money for small improvements (which is what will happen I think if we went for 4K). 

Audio quality is important, as getting older and is getting harder to hear dialogue, so quality sound is appreciated.  As mentioned, when high quality is desired (eg. music, movies) will go through the hifi.  But do want it listenable for everyday watching, would hate to have a tinny sound.

  • Like 1
Posted

At the budget end, suggest looking at TCL and Hisense rather than Kogan, Aldi, Sonic.  TCL is now the largest TV manufacturer, producing panels for almost everyone. Hisense is not far behind, better quality.

 

LG, Samsung, Sony, Panasonic, Philips (now a minor player) tend to play at the mid to higher end and struggling to compete with TCL on price, driven by manufacturing scale.  Sony, for example, differentiate using their video processing technology.  There is still lingering brand loyalty towards these main stream brands, and perceived to have better quality than TCL and Hisense.

 

The best picture quality are OLED screens, driven by LG & Samsung, but are expensive.  But from where you are coming from, almost everything will be much better!

 

Is there a physical reason why screen cannot go bigger?  Dimensions of space please, because a modern TV tend to longer due to aspect ratio..

 

Don't know whether you are prepared to have a look this weekend at JB?  Yes, it will tempting at these prices 

https://www.jbhifi.com.au/products/hisense-55-q6nau-4k-qled-smart-tv-2024

https://www.jbhifi.com.au/products/hisense-55-u6nau-mini-led-4k-qled-smart-tv-2024

https://www.jbhifi.com.au/products/hisense-55-u7nau-uled-mini-led-4k-smart-tv-2024

Qled vs mini LED, U6 entry vs U7 mid. For the time being, ignore the different LED jargon and use your eyes to compare.  Note that those demo TVs are all set to very high brightness.

 

For a sound bar

https://www.jbhifi.com.au/products/sonos-beam-compact-smart-soundbar-gen-2-black

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, audiofeline said:

Our budget is not excessive, am wanting to know how much need to spend to get something reasonably good that will last years.  But don't want to spend money on features that I won't use or appreciate. 

Viewing distance is about 3m, we find our current Philips 47" a good size, can't go bigger and don't want to go smaller. 

 

a $ number would be helpful 🙂 

 

so looking at a 50" or smaller ? 

 

id aim for an oled myself to go with the mantra of reasonably good that would last years... 

  • Like 2

Posted

Thanks for the clarification of brands.  I used to buy the big names in the past, but I'm not familiar with many of the popular brands that are around now.  I will consider TCL and Hisense now.  I won't buy another Sony product after their appalling customer service refusing to honour a faulty product during the warranty period; they eventually replaced it with an item that failed within a few weeks - they burned a previously loyal customer (but that's another story). 

 

50" will fit our space, not enough room to go bigger. 

 

Can't give $, as at this stage trying to work out what quality/specs we would want.  The JB suggestions are certainly affordable. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Good that you are open to TCL & Hisense; many here, especially those aiming at the higher end, won't consider them.  Yes, they do have their issues with quality, but then, Sony let you down.  

 

Oops, I gave you 55" TVs.  Please check your space, especially width, to see whether they will fit.  Modern TVs are now a lot longer.

 

*** And there are fewer choices for 50" TVs and fewer deals, which indicate that demand is for 55" or larger.  Any chance that you can accommodate a larger TV?  

 

I did not mention power consumption because most LED TVs are relatively low (unlike Plasma in the past!), but you can check each model as you create your shortlist.

 

One last thing. Use Rtings to do further research and educate yourself.  Yes, USA models, and may not be the best review source but a good starting point for your journey.  

 

Good luck in your search...

Edited by Snoopy8
Added **
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I went into JB for a quick look this arvo, was surprised that they had so few smaller sets.  Also did some measurements, might be able to do 55" as it's only a few inches physically wider than our current set.  Frustrated that the demo images they show are all super-saturated high-contrast, and they don't show video with content similar to what I'd see at home. 
Also surprised the prices are lower than I anticipated. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Any opinions on refresh rates?  I hear that the high refresh is good for sports and games, which isn't relevant for me.  What's a good quality for normal viewing rate?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, audiofeline said:

I went into JB for a quick look this arvo, was surprised that they had so few smaller sets.  Also did some measurements, might be able to do 55" as it's only a few inches physically wider than our current set.  Frustrated that the demo images they show are all super-saturated high-contrast, and they don't show video with content similar to what I'd see at home. 
Also surprised the prices are lower than I anticipated. 

unfortunately they have them on "shop mode" ie cranked to max... to draw like moths to a flame... and usually on demo loops that are usually CGI created.....have no bearing to how will perform in the home...or on more real material...or the less than perfect ...

 

in jb hifi below would be my suggestions to check out in 55" Tvs... some excellent discounts .. its a buyers market 🙂 

https://www.jbhifi.com.au/collections/tvs/oled-tvs?Screen Size (Inches)=55

Edited by betty boop
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

If you go early in the morning on a weekday, you may be able to convince them to change the horrible  demo setting and use movie material.

 

10 hours ago, audiofeline said:

Any opinions on refresh rates?  I hear that the high refresh is good for sports and games, which isn't relevant for me.  What's a good quality for normal viewing rate?

Rather than refresh rates, look through any Rtings TV review and look at

https://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/picture-quality/contrast-ratio

https://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/motion/24p

https://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/picture-quality/upscaling-sharpness-processing

 

However, it is easier to use the higher level ratings such as mixed usage and TV shows, then drill down to these ratings.

 

10 hours ago, audiofeline said:

Also surprised the prices are lower than I anticipated. 

So, do you want to consider the brands you know, and maybe OLED?

 

And, my elderly neighbours were in the same situation like you, quite adamant that the then 42" was more than adequate. I convinced them to go 48" and they now have a second one, 60"!  😄    Can you rearrange to take a larger TV?  You will not regret it...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 hours ago, audiofeline said:

Any opinions on refresh rates?  I hear that the high refresh is good for sports and games, which isn't relevant for me.  What's a good quality for normal viewing rate?

 

 

I ended up getting a Samsung 65" S90C OLED, last year, excellent TV, as already advised go the maximum in size you can fit, OLED is another level in quality for sure.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

What are the differences between OLED and QLED?  |
JB had a Samsung QLED that was more expensive but had the best energy rating.

 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, audiofeline said:

What are the differences between OLED and QLED?  |
JB had a Samsung QLED that was more expensive but had the best energy rating.

 

 

Some info, from the Net..

 

OLED TVs

Best for: picture quality
Organic Light-Emitting Diode displays take the crown right now as the best premium TV tech around. You get better viewing angles, deeper blacks – and therefore better contrast for HDR . They’re often a better option for gaming, but can cost more.

OLED TVs

For

Lighter and thinner

Precise colors

Deeper black tones

Against

Small risk of burn-in

Limited full-screen brightness

More expensive

 

QLED TVs
Quantum dot LED TV displays have a potentially brighter picture than OLED, are mostly cheaper and still come with a lot of similar features. They'll offer great bang for your buck, but their contrast, black levels and even colors won't be as accurate as OLED.

 

For

Vivid colors

High brightness potential

More budget friendly

Against

Potential backlight blooming

Inconsistent black tones

Contrast not as strong as OLED

Edited by Bass13
  • Thanks 1

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, audiofeline said:

What are the differences between OLED and QLED?  |
JB had a Samsung QLED that was more expensive but had the best energy rating.

Now you are getting into the "gutter" 😄   

 

Samsung makes things difficult.  There is QD OLED (Quantum Dot OLED) and QLED (Quantum Dot LED).  Confused?  :hmm:  

 

OLED (in general) has the best PQ and is more expensive.  There is also WOLED and LG introduced MLA to improve brightness to counter Samsung.

 

Suggest you decide whether you are prepared spend more on OLED before then deciphering OLED.

Edited by Snoopy8
Typo
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, audiofeline said:

What are the differences between OLED and QLED?  |
JB had a Samsung QLED that was more expensive but had the best energy rating.


don’t be fooled ! By James or energy ratings 

 

OLED is oled

QLED is just  lcd back lit by led

 

Samsung want to fool you with them looking very similar in name … folks will miss read QLED as OLED

 

compare energy rating vs use and how much the difference is in real world and it’s 2/5ths stuff all !

 

https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/qled-vs-oled-whats-the-difference-and-which-is-better/

 

 

“OLED stands for "organic light-emitting diode."

QLED (according to Samsung) stands for "quantum dot LED TV."

OLED is a fundamentally different technology from LCD, the major type of TV.

QLED is a variation of LED LCD, adding a quantum dot film to the LCD "sandwich."

OLED is "emissive," meaning the pixels emit their own light.

QLED, like LCD, is "transmissive" in its current form and relies on an LED backlight.

A QLED TV is just an LCD TV with quantum dots”

 

 

Edited by betty boop
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

I had a 42inch which was in the cabinet below, ended up using a extendable wall mount, mounted to my cabinet internally which enabled me to go bigger, 65 was the largest I could go, otherwise the doors on either side would hit the TV.

 

As for the S90C,  as previously advised OLED is the go, Im very happy with it,  its been replaced by the S95C. Good luck on your hunt...

 

20241201_143013.thumb.jpg.e5fa272620a92b0ca2f76c5a6f91a8fa.jpg

Edited by Bass13
spelling
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

OLED, OLED, OLED. If your budget allows, don’t muck around with the other screen types - in comparison, OLED looks more natural and correct and the inky blacks are to die for!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, pete_mac said:

OLED, OLED, OLED. If your budget allows, don’t muck around with the other screen types - in comparison, OLED looks more natural and correct and the inky blacks are to die for!

Hey there Pete.

Did you, by any chance mention OLED?:lol:

I must admit I am saving up for one but it won't be happening for a while.

My consolation is that by the time I am able to buy technology will have advanced and maybe OLED sets may be less expensive. In the meantime my current set is more than ok.

  • Like 1

Posted
40 minutes ago, rantan said:

Hey there Pete.

Did you, by any chance mention OLED?:lol:

I must admit I am saving up for one but it won't be happening for a while.

My consolation is that by the time I am able to buy technology will have advanced and maybe OLED sets may be less expensive. In the meantime my current set is more than ok.


Yes Linday, you might say I’m enthusiastic about the OLEDs!

 

We’ve got a few TVs on the house, including a 75” Samsung Q75 QLED, back when this model had full array local dimming, an older 65” Hisense P7 and a LG 65” A1 which was the basic entry-level unit about 2-3 years ago. The LG handily trumps the other two. 
 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, pete_mac said:


One can trust 100% of pete_mac’s advice at least 33% of the time! 

That is very succinctly put mate. Can I borrow it occasionally?

  • Haha 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...
To Top