Andythiing Posted June 30, 2021 Posted June 30, 2021 (edited) https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190726165823.htm Edited July 2, 2021 by andythiing Better taste 1
audiofeline Posted July 1, 2021 Posted July 1, 2021 It's accuracy would be determined by the type of leads used. And if the microphone was coupled/decoupled. I'm sure pleasing results would be shown if it was an analogue device, but results might be a bit harsh if it was digital technology.
Guest DrSK Posted July 1, 2021 Posted July 1, 2021 (edited) Love it. Finally settles the analogue vs digital debate. There is no such thing as analogue. It is just a digital simulation. Just digital with a Fock step size. Edited July 1, 2021 by DrSK
aasza Posted July 1, 2021 Posted July 1, 2021 (edited) So how long till HiFi manufacturers start using Fock and Qubit factors of their components as a sales gimmick... It could be the new PMPO *cough cough Sony, 4000W of distortion is not impressing anyone* Edited July 1, 2021 by aasza
Steffen Posted July 1, 2021 Posted July 1, 2021 I’ve long suspected that the true nature of sound is digital 1
lancer181 Posted July 1, 2021 Posted July 1, 2021 (edited) I see now sound is sound not digital or analogue or what ever else . We just make devices that distort sound which puts it into a group of known sounds which you either like or not . The greatest quest is to sound natural which is real sound nothing more nothing less. Edited July 1, 2021 by lancer181
ray4410 Posted July 1, 2021 Posted July 1, 2021 way back the meaning of HIGH FIDELITY (hifi) was the closest approach to the original sound, today i think we have come pretty close to that goal with either analogue or digital playback systems.
Recommended Posts