Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

it seems that the only difference between the ultimate and the complete edition is the metalic briefcase. and an additional us$42 :o

 

Blade Runner (Five-Disc Ultimate Collector's Edition) for us$69.95

 

Posted
the 'briefcase' is described in the press release as a unique 'digipackage' - i don't think it's metal...it's just coloured plastic.

the official phrase from warner studios for the cool replica vk briefcase is “Deckard Briefcase”

 

Am I seeing things on the prices.  US$28 for 5 HD- DVD discs?  :o

 

there was some hooha about the low pricing and whether the hd-dvd will be combos ???

 

Posted

Given the low price of the hi def discs, I am sorely tempted to get them as well as the briefcase (on SD DVD), to 'future-proof' myself.  You've got to wonder if the price of the hi def releases is a typo, or a loss-leader for a limited time only.

Posted

the official phrase from warner studios for the cool replica vk briefcase is “Deckard Briefcase”

 

there was some hooha about the low pricing and whether the hd-dvd will be combos ???

 

 

From Warners' press release:

 

The Ultimate Collector's Edition will be presented in a unique 5-disc digi-package with handle which is a stylish version of Rick Deckard's own briefcase, in addition each briefcase will be individually numbered and in limited supply.

 

 

 

Posted

the official phrase from warner studios for the cool replica vk briefcase is “Deckard Briefcase”

 

there was some hooha about the low pricing and whether the hd-dvd will be combos ???

 

 

But I thought combo discs suppose to be more expensive to make right?  I mean,  look at the 300 BR and HD-DVD combo prices.....  They are screaming for it to be released only on HD-DVD and price it same as BD.

 

By the way,  what is this thing about the briefcase that interest you guys?  I am just curious.  ???  Do people collect these things?  I do see Kung Fu dolls,  and Polar Express toys as well....

Posted

there are a healthy number of us in this forum and elsewhere who collect these things for their fancy packaging, besides them being great movies in the first place. in the case of Blade Runner, not only is it a classic movie, it's being given the deluxe treatment which is long overdue.

 

i'm glad that the briefcase packaging is being extended to all formats - i hope the other studios will copy this smart move also when they release other premium titles from their vaults in the near future.

 

the possibilities are endless !  ;D

 

Posted

if only they would press all the various cuts of the movie on one hd disc with seamless branching ;D. anyway here are the pictures to the two-disc and four-disc dvd edition priced at us$20.97 srp and us$34.99 srp respectively

 

 

 

  • 4 months later...

Posted

Sorry, I was out of touch with the DVD scene for donkey years, until I chance upon this thread again.  So is this final cut a new version? different from the directors cuts? And the important question is does this package has elusive the theatrical version?

Posted

Sorry, I was out of touch with the DVD scene for donkey years, until I chance upon this thread again.  So is this final cut a new version? different from the directors cuts? And the important question is does this package has elusive the theatrical version?

Very slightly different.  Scott went back and fixed some of the problems which technology can now take care of, and some editorial (or shooting) 'mistakes'. 

 

And yes, the package has both the original 1982 theatrical version (and the international version), as well as the 1992 "Director's Cut".  And if you get the full-on 5-disc version, the fabled "workprint" version as well. 

 

Mine is still en route in shipment, but I have no doubt this is the standout release of the year.  Hands down.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

With the end of the hi def format war, I ordered the Blu-ray version of this and received it earlier this week.  Yesterday I finally got a PS3, and hooked it up over HDMI.  Even on my "only HD-ready" 434, when the movie opened with the so-called "Hades shot" and of the eye, it was simply jaw-dropping.  Then the fly-by of the Tyrell Corporation building.  The city-scapes with the giant billboards, flying blimp advertising moving off-world, and later the spinner flying to and landing on police HQ.  Simply amazing.  As it was late I didn't watch much more,  but I really look forward to when I can sit down and watch from start to finish.

 

Having said that, at the Sony showroom I was watching demos of Spiderman 3 on BR.  What bothered me was that CGI was very obviously CGI, e.g. when the beam smashed the glass of the office and glass went flying everywhere and down to the ground, it was very obviously CGI.  In contrast, in Blade Runner the "Hades shot" was shot using miniatures, and even in BD looked 'real'.

 

Whilst CGI is certainly a valuable tool to have, sometimes I think there is just something 'organic' about real models, which CGI sometimes simply do not match.

Posted

Having said that, at the Sony showroom I was watching demos of Spiderman 3 on BR.  What bothered me was that CGI was very obviously CGI, e.g. when the beam smashed the glass of the office and glass went flying everywhere and down to the ground, it was very obviously CGI.  In contrast, in Blade Runner the "Hades shot" was shot using miniatures, and even in BD looked 'real'.

 

Whilst CGI is certainly a valuable tool to have, sometimes I think there is just something 'organic' about real models, which CGI sometimes simply do not match.

 

agree absolutely. CGI technology improves all the time, but sometimes it's just done really lazily, even in big films like Spiderman 3. the sandman was good, but the rest of the effects were pretty bad, especially the scene near the beginning when spidey fights the green goblin.

 

one trick that is used often is to make everything superfast and blur, so that you can't tell how bad the CGI is. but it also means that in the end you can't tell what's happening. parts of the big fight at the end of TRANSFORMERS were like that - lots of motion and explosions, but you really can't see what exactly the transformers are doing.

 

 

Posted

one trick that is used often is to make everything superfast and blur, so that you can't tell how bad the CGI is. but it also means that in the end you can't tell what's happening. parts of the big fight at the end of TRANSFORMERS were like that - lots of motion and explosions, but you really can't see what exactly the transformers are doing.

 

Heck, they do that for live action even.  Just consider the fight scenes in the Bourne movies, especially the latter two.  Hence my appreciation (once in a while) for those old-school 70s kung-fu movies, shot as wide shots, where you can clearly see the two protagonists going at it, no edits, cutaways, close-ups or anything, just non-stop sequences.  All choreographed to death no doubt, but one must appreciate the effort that went into all of it.

Posted

It is amazing what they could achieve during those days, and the miniatures and optical effects still hold up on HD.  And the remastered sound,....wow!

 

 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...
To Top