Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All, I was wondering if anyone here could direct me to a optical cable ? Is glass better over plastic ? does J.B Hi-Fi sell a good one ? I intend to run it from my Apple desktop computer to my Schiit Modi 3. Thanks 

Posted

If you're after an optical toslink cable there are only 2 I would recommend. Either a Lifatec Silflex or Wireworld Supernova 7 borosilicate type. I've tried countless plastic ones and they don't sound the same.

  • Like 2
Posted

I’ve been researching the same topic for a little while now. I agree with the post above, both of those are excellent and are on the shortlist. If budget isn’t an option consider the DH Labs Glass Master Toslink Optical.

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 19/11/2020 at 7:06 PM, david j said:

I have a dh labs and a wireworld supernova   

 

Both excellent  performers 

Howdy David

 

would you have a preference between the DH Labs Glass Master and the Wireworld Supanova 7

 

if not a preference , a sonic difference of opinion

 

christopher

Posted

There on different systems  havent really compared  both very good     wireworld probably sell better on the second hand market if you need to move on

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I'm having trouble finding an Australian source of a decent glass Toslink cable. Any suggestions?

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, mikey d said:

I'm having trouble finding an Australian source of a decent glass Toslink cable. Any suggestions?

 

Cannot remember seeing  Australian made Toslink cables from this list?

 

Posted

They all sound the same to me. I would buy one based on the quality of the connector instead of worrying about the potential sound quality of the transfer medium. I doubt there's any Australian company that makes one though.

Posted
Just now, Ittaku said:

They all sound the same to me. I would buy one based on the quality of the connector instead of worrying about the potential sound quality of the transfer medium. I doubt there's any Australian company that makes one though.

 

33 minutes ago, Snoopy8 said:

 

Cannot remember seeing  Australian made Toslink cables from this list?

 

Sorry, I don't mean Aussie made, just a retailer / distributor of quality Toslink cables.

Posted (edited)

As @Ittaku states the connectors are key on all cables regardless of price range. As of last week my Wireworld Supernova 7 toslink cable mentioned above stopped functioning. The red light is still there so there is definitely something wrong with the connectors.

 

In addition to the Silflex Lifatec and Wireworld Supernova 7 cables, the QED Reference borosilicate optical cable also looks interesting.

Edited by xlr8or

Posted (edited)

10 years ago when I tried some different optical cables the glass based ones did sounder better than plastic. I ended up with the original metal jacketed Lifatec back then (its a soft 'optisilk' jacket now).

If you are interested in the numbers game here is how many strands.....

 

QED Reference Optical Quartz Toslink (210 strands borosilicate fiber optic)
DH LABS Glass Master Toslink (300 strands of proprietary glass fibers)
WIREWORLD Supernova 7 Toslink (338 strands borosilicate fiber optic)
LIFATEC Premium Silflex Toslink (470 strands glass fiber optic)

 

From this it looks like Lifatec is still king of the price v performance ratio like it was back then (but sometimes these numbers-of-strands games don't always result in better sound).

 

I am not sure if there is there any difference between glass fiber strands and borosilicate fibers. Maybe its the same thing, or maybe boro-silicate is its own thing and different to normal glass strands.

 

And finally DH LABS claims to be using proprietary glass fibers. Could be true, but we all know the marketing pages of cables companies love to pretend they have proprietary wire/shields/composites when they don't.

The Sys Concepts page claims to have a cable with 1300 strands but its a Toslink-Mini only, no Toslink-Toslink.

 

 

Edited by agisthos
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, agisthos said:

I am not sure if there is there any difference between glass fiber strands and borosilicate fibers. Maybe its the same thing, or maybe boro-silicate is its own thing and different to normal glass strands.

Borosilicate is a type of glass. It has a lower coefficient of thermal expansion than normal glass.

Test tubes, high end glassware, etc, resistant to cracking with sudden temperature changes. It's also harder than standard soda-lime glass.

So possibly no difference when used as the fibre in a fibre optic cable.

Edited by pwstereo
  • Like 2
  • 4 months later...
Posted (edited)

I am a big fan of QED reference optical.

for 140 aud on amazon , it is the best value for money digital cable.

I just thought wow when i first listen to it.

it make a BIG improvement in audio.

 

it beats chords opticord or c-lite significately, which i also own.

 

haven't compared it to supernova or other highend ones, though

 

 

Edited by Hung02
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 14/03/2021 at 3:41 AM, agisthos said:

...And finally DH LABS claims to be using proprietary glass fibers. Could be true, but we all know the marketing pages of cables companies love to pretend they have proprietary wire/shields/composites when they don't...

 

Yes, but the name they give the cable certainly is proprietary!

 

 

 

Edited by audiofeline
  • 2 years later...
Posted

I listed those optical cable options here 3 years ago. I ended up getting another Lifatec Silflex, as that’s what I had before. This was for an LG OLED TV > DAC connection.

 

It’s not my audiophile streamer, but the TV is still an important connection for me, considering all my tv/netflix/movie/xbox listening is done via this optical cable.

 

I just now tried a QED Reference optical. Better better better in every way possible over the Lifatec. @Hung02 was spot on.

 

So to answer my own question, does fibre strand count matter? Obviously no, as the QED has less than half the strands of the Lifatec. Maybe it’s the borosilicate that makes the difference? 
 

Only question now is how the DH Labs and Wireworld compare to this QED Reference!

Posted

Since my last post, I have own the Wirewold supernova and the Chord Vodka optical cables.

I still prefer the QED Reference. 

 

Posted

There have been several posts commenting on the different audio quality with these connectors (eg. plastic vs glass).  Out of curiosity, what are the noticiable improvements with a better quality optical connector?

Note - I'm not doubting a there is a difference, I've not had any experience with optical cables.

Posted
5 hours ago, Hung02 said:

Since my last post, I have own the Wirewold supernova and the Chord Vodka optical cables.

I still prefer the QED Reference. 

 


That’s good to know. Both of those cables are a bit more expensive than the QED Reference.

Posted
43 minutes ago, audiofeline said:

There have been several posts commenting on the different audio quality with these connectors (eg. plastic vs glass).  Out of curiosity, what are the noticiable improvements with a better quality optical connector?

Note - I'm not doubting a there is a difference, I've not had any experience with optical cables.


Well for non music media (visual content) I found this: Background detail and ambience improved, clarity of voices, tonality and bass increased. Subtle music cues in the soundtracks more separated and easily noticeable.

 

I presume for music the improvement will be similar, but as stated that’s not my use case for this.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I used to get a Japan made optical years ago, was very plain basic looking but performed really well.  Mine does TV to $40 dac duty but I'm waiting on a yammy ES800 which has inbuilt dac,  (I like vintage, even surround gear 🙂) and it prolly deserves a better cable,  might have to try the QED one!

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...
To Top