Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi James,

 

It's far more better than the Katipo in my system. But I don't need them anymore.

 

And finally, Pass Labs INT-150 is the match amp for S1.4 so far, better than these combination I tried.

Plinus CD-LAD + Plinius SA100 MK3

Plinius M16 + SA50

Plinius M16 or Plinius CD-LAD or Shindo + ASL aq-1009

Posted

Komako user over here.

100+ hours on mine now; more than happy with the results.

 

So cables already run-in (such as those on TM) means the time has been spent already....and time is money!

Posted

 

hopeman;129824 wrote:
Hi James,

 

 

 

It's far more better than the Katipo in my system. But I don't need them anymore.

 

 

 

And finally, Pass Labs INT-150 is the match amp for S1.4 so far, better than these combination I tried.

 

Plinus CD-LAD + Plinius SA100 MK3

 

Plinius M16 + SA50

 

Plinius M16 or Plinius CD-LAD or Shindo + ASL aq-1009

 

Hi Alex, congratulations on the Pass Labs. Nelson Pass knows his business! The Dyns would love the quality and grip of that Integrated so I bet they are singing like never before:) Are you going to give us an insight with photos in the 'Forum members system'? I'd like to hear what you've found as you've been through a long journey with your gear.

 

Cheers James.

Posted

I could be tempted by either Komako or AQ Sky. I have AQ Colorado between pre and power amp. Could do with better cable from CD-Dac to Preamp. Any suggestions on which would be better?

(I run Kimber Monocle spkr cables and AQ Pikes Peak for phono stage to preamp).

Thx, Glenn

Posted

AQ SKY is better than KOMAKO in my system.

 

If it's not only 0.5M, I will keep it for next upgrade.

 

But they're not the cable will tune the sound to warmer, if your system already sounds forward or bright, don't use either of them.

Posted

 

hopeman;129938 wrote:
AQ SKY is better than KOMAKO in my system.

 

 

 

If it's not only 0.5M, I will keep it for next upgrade.

 

 

 

But they're not the cable will tune the sound to warmer, if your system already sounds forward or bright, don't use either of them.

 

Hopeman

 

You have both AQ sky and Kimber KCAG. Which one is a better cable in your opinion?

Posted

 

whale;130027 wrote:
What is that black tube thing on the cable for?

 

I'm not an electrical engineer but it's to do with the way that Audioquest believe signals behave as they flow down the cable. This 'device' (DBS?) seeks to improve the sound. Best to look at the AQ website but I suspect you need to have a pretty good grasp of physics to understand it!

I tried the AQ Colorado I/C (which uses this DBS concept) against some others and found it sounded better. So much so, I bought it. Don't understand it, but my ears were happy. :)

Glenn

Posted

Its a pretty straight forward idea actually. DBS stands for Dielectric Bias System. The idea is to apply a voltage across an anode that goes down the centre of the cable and the shield acts as a cathode. What this apparently does is align the molecules or fields in the dielectric which does away with having to burn a cable in... or something... it does make sense, and I have to say when I was at EHF we did some listening tests with Skys with the DBS on and off (although you have to wait a couple of weeks for the effect to wear of the cable) and you could hear a difference. The DBS cable was certainly smoother and seemed to have less grain. And that was with a blind test as well...

Posted

Next item will be the

 

Antique Sound Labs AQ 1009 845 Mono blocks

Includ 4X 845 & 4X 845C for tube-rolling, extra 4 X 12AU7, 2 X EL34 for spare.

 

Looking at $1500 start price, anyone interested please PM me.

Pick up only due to heavy weight, 60KG total.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...
To Top