Skid_MacMarx Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Hicks's plea in front of a United States military tribunal came after defence lawyers said he was weighing a plea deal that could get him out of Guantanamo Bay, where he has spent the past five years.Hicks had earlier refused to enter a plea, but his lawyers approached the presiding judge with the change of the plans in a reconvened session. ..... Greens party leader Bob Brown said Hicks's guilty plea was "simply a plea for release, for exit from the inhumane Guantanamo gulag". "Hicks's guilt will always be in doubt, the Howard Government's guilt in this affair will never be in doubt," he said. Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce questioned the trial process. "The only thing that is guilty here is the judicial process under which he was being tried," he said. http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200703/s1882672.htm
Hussla Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 I'm sure Bob Brown would enjoy living under an Islamic Australia, perhaps Bob can give preferences to a Taliban Party that is led by Mr Hicks himself (if ever he returns to Australia) What Bob Brown forgets is if this was an Islamic State, he would be beheaded for been a homosexual...Does the enemy of my enemy make us friends? just because Bob and Islamic extremist share the same anti-US hatred doesn't mean the extremists wouldn't cut his head off or maybe impale him with a stake through his butt-hole! Either way Hicks well actually his lessor known Islamic name Mohammed Dawood (kinda like how Anakin Skywalkers Sith name is Darth Vader) is a terrorist supporter, terrorist organisation member, trained with terrorists, served with terrorist and should be put to death for such.
mello yello Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Anyone who wishes to execute people who have not killed anyone should be SHOT!!!!! How about it Chris? how about we shoot you first..and ask you questions later Like ..what did it feel like to be shot? are you a changed man? would you recommend being shot to a friend or family member? would you shoot a friend or family member yourself or leave it to someone else? would you shoot the entire Geelong backline if you found out they were on drugs?...actually shootings too good for them
Hussla Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Anyone who wishes to execute people who have not killed anyone should be SHOT!!!!!How about it Chris? how about we shoot you first..and ask you questions later Like ..what did it feel like to be shot? are you a changed man? would you recommend being shot to a friend or family member? would you shoot a friend or family member yourself or leave it to someone else? would you shoot the entire Geelong backline if you found out they were on drugs?...actually shootings too good for them To answer. 1. Yes, it'll sure hurt though providing I survive. 2. Changed? No! 3. Yes I would, it'll be a fashion craze when I'm through with it. 4. Prolly leave it to someone else 5. I dont like AFL players, so that'll be a good start
mello yello Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 To answer.1. Yes, it'll sure hurt though providing I survive. I bet you tease all the firing squads with that one No you wont survive Is that still a yes?
minchjp Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Anyone who wishes to execute people who have not killed anyone should be SHOT!!!!! How ironic
Santa1503559644 Posted March 28, 2007 Posted March 28, 2007 We've been over this before with Chris! I still think he should put his money where his mouth is and kill himself to prove his point.
Recommended Posts