mello yello Posted March 7, 2007 Posted March 7, 2007 This is something that should be condemmed as it happens just as fervently and with as much reslove as condemming a terrorist attack. This sort of thing is amongst the lowest forms of gutter politics imaginable. Im talking about a different sort of terrorist attack Im talking about an attack on a persons innocent family members with the specific intention of securing a political goal Isnt that just another form of terrorism? Mental indiscrimminate stress causing emotional injury to innocent 3rd parties..such as a politicians family. Nothing is lower or slimier than the traditional good ole Pommy style "sex scandal" to find an Achilles Heel in an opponent when all else fails. Ever since Billy Clinton "never had sex with that woman" have I ever seen such a level of hypocritical slimey two faced cowardly back stabbing . not since Julius got it in the back from Brutus his gay lover (rumour has it) From Canberra .....typically ....it is the Liberals resorting to question the Chief Minister where he was on the night of Canberras fatal bushfires as he was unreachable.....ok point made......John Stanhope, lettuce leaf slap and keep your mobile switched on.....should have ended there. Nope....not for , as John Stanhope rightly puts it, the slimeballs in the Liberal Party Slimeball trying to ruin my marriage: chief minister In an extraordinary outburst, ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope has accused the Liberal Opposition of trying to destroy his marriage through a whispering campaign about where he was the night before the 2003 bushfires ripped through Canberra.During an emotionally charged debate in the Legislative Assembly yesterday, Mr Stanhope called Liberal MLA Brendan Smyth a "slimeball from Tuggeranong" who belonged in the gutter. Brendan Smyth the slimeball from Tuggeranong. Im sure both sides could be guilty of this sort of slimeracking...but is it necessary? I reckon it should be condemmed until it becomes.....as in this case irrelevant.
mello yello Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 I knew there was a thread about this somewhere I know Im a bit late....but here is todays Liberal Slimeball Of The Week yep you guessed it "Wild" Bill Heffernan...a Senator no less Heffernan sorry for 'inappropriate' Gillard remarks You all know the story....and actually I heard last night it was going to be published in The Bulletin today..so if everyone knew it was coming..and everyone judged it to be innapropriate and irrelevant...why didnt they retract the story? Anyway Senator Heffernan has a right to speak his mind and voice his opinion..but what makes him todays Slimeball Of The Week is that he doesnt have the balls to stick to his supposed convictions. Senator Bill Heffernan...This slimeball's for you What frigging difference does it make if a woman has or chooses not to have children.....and what do you know about women anyway ....you racist **** :ph34r:
Skid_MacMarx Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 you would expect this type of comment from his catholic mate Aloysius Abbott how to win the womens' vote in this country.. onya Heffernan
Santa1503559644 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 you would expect this type of comment from his catholic mate Aloysius Abbotthow to win the women's vote in this country.. onya Heffernan Costello came out with a standard feeble comment. Abbott, otoh, was AWOL!
Aloysius Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 Appalling blindness, and probably hypocracy, that can only see "slime on one side of politics. Santa says" all Pollies are not nice" - but apparently some are not nicer than others Good grief you gotta be kidding - it's barely believable that an educated and caring anyone can only see failures on the "enemies side" - "Hey our guys don't do that "- Oh no And now we have a typically inappropriate labelling of myself as a Catholic - who knows why? My son is law is, I'm not. Fortunately I really don't give a rats ass what people label me as This is the stuff of Heffernan that folks complain about and then indulge in themselves WTF
mello yello Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 Appalling blindness, and probably hypocracy, that can only see "slime on one side of politics.Santa says" all Pollies are not nice" - but apparently some are not nicer than others Good grief you gotta be kidding - it's barely believable that an educated and caring anyone can only see failures on the "enemies side" - "Hey our guys don't do that "- Oh no And now we have a typically inappropriate labelling of myself as a Catholic - who knows why? My son is law is, I'm not. Fortunately I really don't give a rats ass what people label me as This is the stuff of Heffernan that folks complain about and then indulge in themselves WTF Oh deary deary Aloy..I knew you wouldnt see the forest.... Leadership qualities are negated by things like corruption, dishonesty, unaccountability, incompetence and a plethora of other criteria. Where is Ms Gillards personal life or any aspect of her personal life going to affect her ability to lead (lets face it ..she could be Australias first woman Prime Minister). Mr Heffernan is typical of a certain judgemental attitude in this government that PRE-judges a person on what or who they are..and not what they do. Its quite natural to have thinking like that cloud their judgements and ultimately lead to a public outcry whenever that line of thinking is voiced. Are you suggesting the Labor Party has resorted to such gutter irrevelant style tactics?.......Challenge........name one..once
Skid_MacMarx Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 And now we have a typically inappropriate labelling of myself as a Catholic - who knows why? My son is law is, I'm not. Fortunately I really don't give a rats ass what people label me as Lighten up Aloysius .. its a play on your username "Aloysius" ie Aloysius Gonzaga http://www.catholicforum.com/saints/sainta08.htm must i place a wink after everything?
Aloysius Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 Oh deary deary Aloy..I knew you wouldnt see the forest....Leadership qualities are negated by things like corruption, dishonesty, unaccountability, incompetence and a plethora of other criteria. Where is Ms Gillards personal life or any aspect of her personal life going to affect her ability to lead (lets face it ..she could be Australias first woman Prime Minister). Mr Heffernan is typical of a certain judgemental attitude in this government that PRE-judges a person on what or who they are..and not what they do. Its quite natural to have thinking like that cloud their judgements and ultimately lead to a public outcry whenever that line of thinking is voiced. Are you suggesting the Labor Party has resorted to such gutter irrevelant style tactics?.......Challenge........name one..once I agree with you, ( about inappropriate talk about Mrs Gillards personal life) and from the beginning have said that, so for crying out loud - don't put words in my mouth - or anything else for that matter As for "am I suggesting" ..........- please spare me that kind of crap - they are politicians, and they don't walk on water, ( even fine and noble ALP politicians) and if you think otherwise ................ You don't think " Greedy Mining Companies" isn't a judgmental attitude? Look at what you are saying!!
mello yello Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 Look at what you are saying!! Im saying] Bill Heffernan is a slimeball and even you agree with that...so dont try and diminish what hes done and attempted to apologise for, by saying "they all do it" ..."they all" arent on trial here, Billy-Bob is. I wouldnt even accept his apology as hes done it before and as Peter Garrett has suggested.."It is Bill Heffernan who is unfit for office ....." Challenge remains Aloy....even though you describe it as "crap". We are not talking about their bouyancy on water...we are talking about resorting to personal irrelevant attacks or atacks on their family in an attempt to discredit an opponent. Thats ok you dont have to take up the challenge if you feel you cant think of any....you can just quietly slip away and leave the thread to its subject matter.....Liberal Party Slimeballs. You can start a Labor Party one if you like...but Id imagine it would be one of the shortest lived threads in living memory
Austen Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 A couple of good examples of totally inappropriate behaviour there guys !!! I don't care if Julia wants to have kids, doesn't want to have kids, can have kids or cannot have kids........................ UNLESS, Her policy judgement is in some way influenced (clouded) by her situation. If she had no children because she thought all kids were evil, that's fine, no worries, as long as she still makes policy judgements from a neutral point-of-view. As long it it doesn't interfere with their policy decisions, or is blatantly hypocritical, a pollies, any pollies, private life and family should stay just that, so Packer et. al. .....Bugger off, I'm not interested in what Julias personal child-decisions are !!!!! Austen.
Aloysius Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 Im saying] Bill Heffernan is a slimeball and even you agree with that...so dont try and diminish what hes done and attempted to apologise for, by saying "they all do it" ..."they all" arent on trial here, Billy-Bob is.I wouldnt even accept his apology as hes done it before and as Peter Garrett has suggested.."It is Bill Heffernan who is unfit for office ....." Challenge remains Aloy....even though you describe it as "crap". We are not talking about their bouyancy on water...we are talking about resorting to personal irrelevant attacks or atacks on their family in an attempt to discredit an opponent. Thats ok you dont have to take up the challenge if you feel you cant think of any....you can just quietly slip away and leave the thread to its subject matter.....Liberal Party Slimeballs. You can start a Labor Party one if you like...but Id imagine it would be one of the shortest lived threads in living memory No diminishing going on here Mello - don't go there - it's not true and I have made my objections clear - as have a number of other folks - PM included. What you are getting upset about (apparently) is my observation that some folks can only find fault with one group. Do you not think that's the case? Do you think there is some drafting mechanism that separates the sheep from the goats and directs them into particular political parties? The title of the thread itself is a bit of a giveaway I guess Any attempt at evenhandedness is defeated because - hey Mell started the thread and it's only about Liberal bad guys. As for starting an equivalent - by now you will know that that kind of negative, whinging, ****y, black attitude is not my preference - "sickeningly optimistic" I think you once called it. Maybe so, but that's my preference
Gas Man Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 i just love the apology that he gave on camera, he apologises, then as he backs away from the mic, he goes, "well, there you go" and looks real unimpressed. Like an apology that your mum made you give to your little sister for stealing her lollies after you got a smack(not that i ever did that ). gone are the days where you could have an individual opinion in a major party. Not many people cross the floor these days. I thought old peter garrett would have done that a couple of times by now. slightly OT, but hey
mello yello Posted February 17, 2011 Author Posted February 17, 2011 Todays triple whammy Liberal Dose Of Slime comes from none other than ... you guessed it... Scott Morrison, Greg Hunt, all the other Noddys and Big Ears himself Tony Abbott http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/17/3141675.htm Morrison dismisses anti-Muslim report as gossip http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/16/3140131.htm Morrison climbs down in funeral row http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/17/3141208.htm Opposition denies anti-Muslim agenda One Nation policyMr Hunt dismissed claims the Coalition is looking to One Nation for policies. In an interview with The Australian, Queensland One Nation director Ian Nelson says the Opposition stole their idea of cutting aid to Indonesian schools to help pay for Queensland's flood recovery. "They can deny all they like, but the idea came from us," he said. Mr Nelson says he made the call to channel foreign aid into the flood recovery on One Nation's website in the aftermath of the floods in and around Brisbane. "After watching this tragedy unfold, we need to see a new model produced with regards to aid, especially foreign aid. Wouldn't common sense dictate that you take care of your own citizens first and foremost?" he wrote on the site. Within weeks Mr Abbott had adopted the policy, calling for $500 million in funding for schools in Indonesia to be cut. But Mr Hunt says the policy has been proposed throughout the community. "I think you'll find that lots of people have very strong views, I think you heard in the last few days, the chairman of the Business Council of Australia raised precisely the same point," he said. Earlier this week Mr Abbott backed ACT Senator Gary Humphries's right to present a three-signature petition demanding a 10-year moratorium on Muslim immigration to the ACT parliament, but said he did not agree with its proposal. slithering slime
mello yello Posted February 17, 2011 Author Posted February 17, 2011 (lets face it ..she could be Australias first woman Prime Minister). you heard it here first on DTV News
50mxe20 Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 http://video.yahoo.com/watch/5314479/14007996
Aloysius Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 No diminishing going on here Mello - don't go there - it's not true and I have made my objections clear - as have a number of other folks - PM included.What you are getting upset about (apparently) is my observation that some folks can only find fault with one group. Do you not think that's the case? Do you think there is some drafting mechanism that separates the sheep from the goats and directs them into particular political parties? The title of the thread itself is a bit of a giveaway I guess Any attempt at evenhandedness is defeated because - hey Mell started the thread and it's only about Liberal bad guys. As for starting an equivalent - by now you will know that that kind of negative, whinging, ****y, black attitude is not my preference - "sickeningly optimistic" I think you once called it. Maybe so, but that's my preference Heh Heh Heh :lol: Twas true then it's true now Poo hiiting the fan a la the ALP report on this and that and out comes Mello's thread from 4 years ago :lol: Pathetic
DrP Posted February 18, 2011 Posted February 18, 2011 Yes indeedy. Aloy's on the run for sure. Things must be really bad in the Lib camp.
mello yello Posted February 18, 2011 Author Posted February 18, 2011 (edited) Heh Heh Heh :lol: Twas true then it's true now Poo hiiting the fan a la the ALP report on this and that and out comes Mello's thread from 4 years ago :lol: Pathetic Yes Im glad you agree, was true 4 years ago with Liberal MLA Brendan Smyth, then 2 months later with "Bill Heffernan...a Senator no less" and now, almost as if it were an Olympic event, in which they have the mortgage on gold medals, almost 4 years later to the date, the Noddys led by Big Ears go all out in a media blitz to all but guarantee their slime status once again. Pathetic and yes Aloy, truly pathetic do you have any other comment as a reply to the Liberal partys blatantly perennial policies of racism and general below gutter style politics ? ...or is that about as much as an acknowledgement and defense you have and are just happy to let the mud (in the Clay Pit) dry for a while Edited February 18, 2011 by mello yello II
mello yello Posted February 18, 2011 Author Posted February 18, 2011 Im sure both sides could be guilty of this sort of slimeracking...but is it necessary? Time to put your money where your mouth is Aloy, I certainly did Ive been waiting 4 years , and still no cash no money, no honey
Aloysius Posted February 19, 2011 Posted February 19, 2011 Time to put your money where your mouth is Aloy, I certainly did Ive been waiting 4 years , and still no cash no money, no honey Which is code for? You have been waiting 4 years for the slime ridden ALP machine to do something honorable? Listen closely: "If you keep doing the same thing and expect a different result, you're crazy"
DrP Posted February 19, 2011 Posted February 19, 2011 Listen closely:"If you keep doing the same thing and expect a different result, you're crazy" Certainly explains a lot about Abbott.
Steve C Posted February 20, 2011 Posted February 20, 2011 Certainly explains a lot about Abbott. ...and Aloysius.
Aloysius Posted February 20, 2011 Posted February 20, 2011 Still nothing substantive to add eh Steviekins Why do you bother? You have nothing to add, your personal attacks are lightweight, accomplishing nothing apart from carefully nurturing that not inconsequential ego of yours - Go teach :lol:
Recommended Posts