Jump to content

Our DIY Ultrasonic Record Cleaner


Owen Y

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, haven't had a chance to try this out yet,

I just have too many other things to do ATM.

 

I do plan to connect the two filters that i purchased in parallel, which should effective;y double the water flow rate.

Am am a bit concerned that the pump will not have sufficient pressure to produce a good flow thru these very fine filters.

 

I also have to figure out a mounting solution in case of leaks.

One of those shallow cleaning type tubs should be ok.

 

I'll keep you all posted when this has progressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I am just about to assemble my USCM and wold like to ask about the Triton solution.

Firstly, where is everyone getting it from?

Secondly, and more importantly, I have just read the MSDS for this product and would like to know how everyone is storing and handling this stuff?

It isn't good reading re: personal safety and disposal in particular.

Am I over thinking that the very diluted form I would use will be harmful to the environment / waterways?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, dirktoggler said:

Hi all,

I am just about to assemble my USCM and wold like to ask about the Triton solution.

Firstly, where is everyone getting it from?

Secondly, and more importantly, I have just read the MSDS for this product and would like to know how everyone is storing and handling this stuff?

It isn't good reading re: personal safety and disposal in particular.

Am I over thinking that the very diluted form I would use will be harmful to the environment / waterways?

Yes, I agree, I have studied the MSDS myself.

However, I figure that in diluted form & being pure detergent (without commercial additives such as bleaches, whiteners, brighteners, water-softeners, fragrances, colourings.... ;) ), that the Triton X-100 in diluted form is probably comparatively benign to our environment.

 

Cheers, Owen

http://darklanternforowen.wordpress.com/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

just tried my cleaner today ...kit from[mention=164463]Owen[/mention] Y ... fantastic.. had some records that I had bought second hand and they were barely playable..so bad that I was going to throw them out. Play really well now with barely any noise and some have no noise at all...hard to believe.

 

The ultrasonic bath was about $130 delivered (look around on ebay for the best price). So easy just leaving the records for 15 minutes. Makes cleaning a lot easier than a vacuum machine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Toyboyo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi @Toyboyo - that's excellent news.

I tend to clean for 25mins+ now, as the inner grooves have much less immersion time with rotation - see diagram on page 3 of this thread.

 

Hi @benny - quite a few members have purchased from Conservation Supplies in NZ:

https://www.conservationsupplies.co.nz/product/triton-x100-cle01/

There was mention of a NSW supplier but I can't quickly find the link now (shipping was fairly high as I recall).

 

Cheers, Owen

http://darklanternforowen.wordpress.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Owen Y said:

Hi @Toyboyo - that's excellent news.

I tend to clean for 25mins+ now, as the inner grooves have much less immersion time with rotation - see diagram on page 3 of this thread.

 

Hi @benny - quite a few members have purchased from Conservation Supplies in NZ:

https://www.conservationsupplies.co.nz/product/triton-x100-cle01/

There was mention of a NSW supplier but I can't quickly find the link now (shipping was fairly high as I recall).

 

Cheers, Owen

http://darklanternforowen.wordpress.com/

LOL I never listen that far in to a record .... inner grooves always ignored ;)

 

@Owen Y in Victoria ... https://www.pacificlab.com.au/shop/products/tl125-500m-triton-x-100-lr/1/name  Triton X-100 LR  500ml  AUD$57.05 (Ex GST) BUT $39.50 delivery !!!! they do sell a larger bottle which might be more economic in regards to delivery

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
On ‎7‎/‎05‎/‎2017 at 2:18 PM, Owen Y said:

Chaps

 

Assembly - those who are assembling this kit, it is pretty simple with just 4 screws (+ 3 motor screws), but these notes may help:

 

  1. You should find the following parts - 3 pcs of laser-cut stainless sheet metalwork, a threaded stainless rod with plastic square adapter for the motor drive, 4 red record spacers & a bag containing 2 black 'clamp knobs', 4 stainless button head hex socket screws + spring washers, 1 ball bearing unit.
  2. Strip off the protective plastic from the sheet metal plates.
  3. The large stainless 'baseplate' has 4 protruding nuts under, which should slide under the cleaner tank flange from the short end of the tank - if you have the correct tank.
  4. Attach the 2 upstanding smaller side plates onto the fold-down sides of the main frame, using the 4 screws + washers (align flush the bottom edges of the plates to the baseplate bottom edge) - the correct orientation of the motor plate to the smaller bearing plate is shown in the pic below. (Note, the pic shows a prototype unit & the metalwork has machine marks ;) )
  5. Motor - remove the black attachment plate from the rotisserie motor & use the same 3 screws & spacers to attach the motor to the motor plate (as pic below) - don't overtighten, don't strip the motor plastic threading.
  6. Assemble the record-rod with its clamp knobs & spacers (as pic below) - the little bearing just sits in the cutout in the bearing plate.

Done!

Cheers, Owen

http://darklanternforowen.wordpress.com/

 

 

IMG_1503.JPG

 

Hi Owen,

 

Your spacers look great - can you tell me how thick they are?

 

 

Thanks,

Andy

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
22 minutes ago, Owen Y said:

Hi @andyr

(Sorry overlooked this....)

From memory - 23mm.

 

Cheers, Owen

http://darklanternforowen.wordpress.com/

 

Thanks, Owen.  They looked thicker than that - which was why I was interested.

 

Can you make them thicker?  (If you use a 40kHz US tank, for optimum cleaning there is supposed to be a 1 1/2" gap between the sides of the tank and the outer LPs ... and the same between LPs.  So one needs 35mm spacers.)

 

 

Andy

 

Edited by andyr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although hardly conforming to any sort of scientific rigour, my trials with the original "Owen" spacers compared to 10mm spacers, my gut feeling is that there is no appreciable detriment to cleanliness by closer spacers given an increased cleaning cycle time.

As time per lp was nearly equivalent, given that closer spacers meant more lps per clean cycle.

 

Hard to do a proper test as you would need lps of the exact same dirtiness to do a proper scientific comparison.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Citroen said:

Although hardly conforming to any sort of scientific rigour, my trials with the original "Owen" spacers compared to 10mm spacers, my gut feeling is that there is no appreciable detriment to cleanliness by closer spacers given an increased cleaning cycle time.

As time per lp was nearly equivalent, given that closer spacers meant more lps per clean cycle.

 

Hard to do a proper test as you would need lps of the exact same dirtiness to do a proper scientific comparison.

 

I'm all for personal experimentation, Citroen, but I also take into account what other people write about.  What I've read says:

  1. cleaning efficiency is degraded when the LPs are less than a wavelength apart.
  2. cleaning efficiency is enhanced by there being more than a wavelength between LPs.
  3. it is probably a good idea to minimise the time an LP spends being subject to the cavitation bombardment in an us tank.
  4. so extra time to compensate for a reduction in cleaning efficiency by having LPs too close together ... is not a good idea.

So I will continue my search for some 35mm spacers.  ( @Owen Y  :winky: )

 

Andy

 

Edited by andyr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess its a matter of theoretically "ideal" and being practical. 

 

Ideally, I'd clean one record at a time. More than a wavelength apart between lps. So why not just do that and forget about spacers andyr?

 

Practically, I prefer to clean as many as possible for a given cleanliness ratio to time factor. 

 

"it is probably a good idea to minimise the time an LP spends being subject to the cavitation bombardment in an us tank."

PROBABLY, maybe, all conjecture.

 

Again, if you want to maximise your clean, by your research, just do them one at a time.

 

I'm very very happy to be more efficient and willing to risk any trade off by doing more at once for a longer time.

 

Each to their own...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Citroen said:

I guess its a matter of theoretically "ideal" and being practical. 

 

Ideally, I'd clean one record at a time. More than a wavelength apart between lps. So why not just do that and forget about spacers andyr?

 

Each to their own...

 

Absolutely - each to their own, Citroen.  I paid extra money for a wide, 60kHz tank - so I could fit 6x LPs at a time, with a 25mm spacer between them (and between the sides).  I did this because it's obviously of benefit to clean 6 LPs at a time - rather than just 1.

 

Now, however, having read some recent posts on the DIYAudio us thread,  I'm just wondering whether I would get better cleaning with, say, 4 LPs in the tank.  Hence my search for 35mm spacers - so I can try this out.

 

Andy

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all.  I've been following this thread (and Owen's site) with great interest for some time.  It's time to take the plunge and sort out my own setup.

I was wondering 2 things:

 

1. If anyone in Melbourne wants to sell a setup, then get in touch!

 

2. There has been so much info and experimenting.  I was wondering if those in the know, if they had time, could possibly do a sticky (or similar) that summarizes all we need to know?  This may include:
- best (current) place to buy the Ultrasonic tub

- best place to get the rotisserie motor

- best place to get surfactant

- best combo of space vs number of records at one time

- best temp to set

- best recipes for filty op shop discs, to looked after older ones, to brand new pressings

 

Once a list is made, I imagine it could be updated as people discover improvements or ideas?  What does everyone think?  Such a great project and will only get better as more and more people report in with their successes, failures, and clever tweaks!

 

Thanks for everyone's hard work and I really look forward to getting into it!  Mat

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mat-with-one-t said:

Hi all.  I've been following this thread (and Owen's site) with great interest for some time.  It's time to take the plunge and sort out my own setup.

I was wondering 2 things:

 

1. If anyone in Melbourne wants to sell a setup, then get in touch!

 

2. There has been so much info and experimenting.  I was wondering if those in the know, if they had time, could possibly do a sticky (or similar) that summarizes all we need to know?  This may include:
- best (current) place to buy the Ultrasonic tub- @benny recently bought one from ebay.

- best place to get the rotisserie motor - Mine came from Kogan.

- best place to get surfactant - I read that Conservation Supplies in NZ no longer ships overseas?

- best combo of space vs number of records at one time - 3 records

- best temp to set - no heating required

- best recipes for filty op shop discs, to looked after older ones, to brand new pressings - the suggested 0.1% to 0.2% Triton X-100 dilution works well, 25 min cycle now recommended.

 

Once a list is made, I imagine it could be updated as people discover improvements or ideas?  What does everyone think?  Such a great project and will only get better as more and more people report in with their successes, failures, and clever tweaks!

 

Thanks for everyone's hard work and I really look forward to getting into it!  Mat

Hi @Mat-with-one-t - a sticky post or two would be good, but only admin can do that I think.

Some answers above (red text).

 

Cheers, Owen

http://darklanternforowen.wordpress.com/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Mat-with-one-t said:

Another question.  I note that Triton X-100 seems to have all sorts of subtypes/grades.  Which one are people using exactly?

Just get the cheapest you can find. For our purposes, we do not need laboratory grade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
On 2/2/2018 at 8:16 PM, andyr said:

 

Absolutely - each to their own, Citroen.  I paid extra money for a wide, 60kHz tank - so I could fit 6x LPs at a time, with a 25mm spacer between them (and between the sides).  I did this because it's obviously of benefit to clean 6 LPs at a time - rather than just 1.

 

Now, however, having read some recent posts on the DIYAudio us thread,  I'm just wondering whether I would get better cleaning with, say, 4 LPs in the tank.  Hence my search for 35mm spacers - so I can try this out.

 

Andy

 

Let us know if you find this works better @andyr

 

What is the recommended minimum for a 40hz machine?

 

You could temporarily try 10 mm hex bolts to spread the records that extra 10 mm, just for experimentation to see if it is actually better.

 

All good stuff Andy, as I'd not come across this wavelength cf spacing theory before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




×
×
  • Create New...
To Top