Jump to content

Torben Fink-Jensen

Full Member
  • Content Count

    517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

211 Excellent

3 Followers

About Torben Fink-Jensen

  • Rank
    500+ Post Club

Profile Fields

  • Region
    Australia
  • Location
    Melbourne

Recent Profile Visitors

3,280 profile views
  1. Further information: I bought these amps off the original owner approximately two years ago. I thought they were a revelation compared to what I was using before Prima Luna. And I was also able to see why a fairly modestly priced pair of amps would get such a high recommendation in the Stereophile Recommended components reviews. In fact these were an upgrade on a Stereo Prologue Premium I was running (and sold when I bought these). One major difference from the upgrade was that instead of running KT88s and then trying KT120s and KT150s on the stereo amp to get enough po
  2. I think so, but it is not for me to judge ;-). I'm not in a great hurry to sell, so you can always see if they are still available after you pay-cheque comes in, but shipping to Perth might be a Pack and Send job!
  3. Further information: I bought these amps off the original owner approximately two years ago. I thought they were a revelation compared to what I was using before Prima Luna. And I was also able to see why a fairly modestly priced pair of amps would get such a high recommendation in the Stereophile Recommended components reviews. In fact these were an upgrade on a Stereo Prologue Premium I was running (and sold when I bought these). One major difference from the upgrade was that instead of running KT88s and then trying KT120s and KT150s on the stereo amp to get enough po
  4. Thanks for documenting this, very useful to know. My question is: Did you prefer the sound of the target curve? When doing DSP, some people report a flat curve as being a bit lifeless (that comment is general, not related to A500s).
  5. Thanks! I'm definitely keen but don't want to impose especially as I understand when people are short of time. I'll PM you and let's see how it goes... definitely not urgent.
  6. If it makes you feel any better, when I got the remote for my Dynaudios (same remote as with the A500s), it took me about 40 minutes just to get the cover off and on, get the batteries the right way and make sure it worked...
  7. Well, if I was serious I'd get a mini-dsp and microphone and manage it properly...I might still do that. Just a bit more of a faff compared to set and forget options like the A500.
  8. Well, I cancelled my A500 order and went for 60XDs. I reasoned that for a similar price to the A500, I was getting a similar set-up, but more akin to the A700. But, I do have a relatively small, boxy room and have ended up using the Roon DSP feature to modify the sound to reduce the room effect. I would be dead keen to do a side by side comparison, but the 60XDs are not exactly portable...so I might be reliant on finding a kindly A500 owner who is happy for a few free beers in return for lumping their speakers over to my place!
  9. Very exciting to have new speakers...hope you get lots of listening time in. It is interesting you say that about the Dynaudios. Dynaudio make a very similar speaker (in some ways potentially identical) in the Focus XD series. There is a bookshelf model the 20XD, but given the additional driver in the Buchardts, you might consider the 30XD a more comparable offering. I would be interested to see if someone has compared them. My impression is that they use the same internal amplifiers (and probably DAC), but Buchardt offers a few more options by way of the Platen Hub being WISA compliant, the M
  10. The talk in reviews is that they adopt a "Fletcher-Munson" curve. Here is the first thing that comes up when I google it Fletcher Munson Curve: A Must-Know for Audio Recording (ehomerecordingstudio.com). Might be worth a read, or your own googling.
  11. Fantastic! Looking forward to listening impressions!
  12. Yep, and you'd also need to know the source and amplification they used vs what you use since that will impact on the sound as well
  13. Oh, personally I'm not worried about it. I'm mostly curious about the distinction between "good" measuring and "bad" measuring speakers in situations where a listener might prefer the "bad" measuring speakers. I'm also interested in room mode effects on that when you are comparing your own experience with what a reviewer has measured (maybe in their own environment). It would be great to be able to look at a review or a set of measurements and think "that is the speaker for me" without having to listen to it. Instead, you really have to demo a new speaker purchase in your own envi
  14. Thanks. Interesting you describe one speaker as "bad" and another as "good" based on these measurements. In the ASR world, speakers that measure in alignment with their ideals are "good", speakers that measure differently, are "bad". Yet plenty of people would swear by Harbeth for example, which get a bit of a thrashing. I also find it hard to reconcile with my experience, where I found (as an example), one amp which measures perfectly as fatiguing on my ears, and one that probably didn't measure as well (a guess, I haven't seen measurements) as offering a better approximation of w
×
×
  • Create New...